Boris Johnson Critiques Trump's Ukraine Peace Proposal Amid Escalating Conflict
Boris Johnson, the former British Prime Minister, has publicly criticized Donald Trump's recent proposals for peace in Ukraine, marking one of his first overt rebukes of the U.S. president concerning the ongoing conflict. Johnson, an ardent supporter of Ukraine and a close ally of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, has previously expressed a complex view regarding Trump's diplomatic approach, suggesting that there might be a method to the apparent madness. However, in a post on social media platform X, he took a firm stance against the terms Trump appears to advocate for.
According to Johnson, the proposed deal would ultimately leave Ukraine with nothing of value. Trump's latest accusations against Zelenskyy assert that the Ukrainian leader is jeopardizing what Trump claims is a forthcoming peace agreement aimed at resolving the war. One particularly contentious point in Trump's approach includes suggesting the recognition of Russia's annexation of Crimea as part of any potential agreement, a move that has drawn immediate backlash.
In response to these developments, Russia conducted one of its most severe air attacks on Kyiv in months, with Kharkiv and other cities also being targeted. Johnson reacted strongly to these assaults, posting on X that, "Putin indiscriminately butchers more Ukrainian civilians, killing and injuring 100 in Kyiv, including children." He questioned what kind of reward or compensation Trump’s proposed peace deal would offer to Ukraine after years of enduring brutal aggression.
Johnson outlined a list of detrimental concessions Trump seems to support, which would benefit Russia while leaving Ukraine vulnerable: 1) the right for Russia to retain Ukrainian territory seized by force; 2) the ability to dictate Ukraine’s foreign policy, including prohibiting NATO membership; 3) the lifting of sanctions on Russia; 4) an economic partnership with the United States; and 5) resources to rebuild Russian military capabilities for future aggression.
As Johnson poignantly queried, "What do Ukrainians get after three years of heroic resistance against a brutal and unprovoked invasion? What is their reward for the appalling sacrifices they have made in the name of freedom and democracy?" He criticized the proposal as failing to provide any real assurance against future Russian invasions, asserting that a credible, well-funded long-term security guarantee from the UK, the US, and all Western allies is necessary for Ukraine’s defense.
In a parallel development, UK Labour leader Keir Starmer condemned the recent Russian strikes in Kyiv, reiterating that they serve as a stark reminder of Russia's role as the aggressor. He emphasized the urgent need for an unconditional ceasefire, stressing the importance of achieving a lasting peace for the embattled nation.
In a somewhat surprising turn, Trump also condemned the Russian strikes on his Truth Social platform, stating, "I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!" This statement illustrates Trump's conflicted stance, as he simultaneously promotes a peace deal while acknowledging the ongoing violence.
Previously, Johnson had criticized Trump's language regarding Zelenskyy, describing it as 'ghastly.' Nonetheless, Johnson defended Trump in a column, arguing that the fallout between Trump and Zelenskyy was not intended and suggested that Trump still holds a viable plan for peace. As tensions persist and the conflict escalates, the diverging perspectives between leaders in the West on how to address Russia’s invasion of Ukraine continue to emerge as a crucial topic in international relations.
Related Sources: