Carlos Mazón's Controversial Response to DANA: A Leadership Crisis Unfolds in Valencia
The aftermath of the catastrophic storm DANA that struck the Comunitat Valenciana on October 29 has left Governor Carlos Mazón facing severe criticism from within his own party. His controversial responses and the perceived absence of leadership during one of the region's most tragic natural disasters have put him in a precarious position, with significant members of his party reportedly expressing harsh criticism in private.
Mazón's handling of the crisis has been marred by a series of shifting narratives and alleged falsehoods related to the government's response. The delay in issuing a mass alert until after the flooding had worsened was seen as a major failure, one that resulted in numerous casualties among Valencians who were caught unprepared.
A particularly troubling episode came to light surrounding a lengthy lunch Mazón had with journalist Maribel Vilaplana on the day of the disaster—during critical hours when he should have been coordinating the emergency response. Initially brushed off as a private engagement, it later became clear that the meeting was work-related, involving discussions about the direction of the regional public television, À Punt. This revelation only further fueled outrage as many wondered how a governor could prioritize a lunch meeting over urgent crisis management.
The meeting began at 3:00 PM, coinciding with a pivotal moment as the Integrated Operational Coordination Center (Cecopi) had convened at 5:00 PM to address the unfolding disaster. Mazón did not attend the Cecopi session until 7:30 PM, by which time many municipalities had already been inundated. Eyewitness accounts reveal that when he finally arrived, he had to be brought up to speed on the dire situation.
The political ramifications of this oversight have already begun to take a toll. Mazón's party, the People's Party (PP), has become increasingly distanced from him as details emerge. Miguel Tellado, a leading figure in the party, explicitly stated that it is Mazón's responsibility to explain his actions during the disaster.
As further scrutiny emerged about his and his council's actions, it was also revealed that emergency response officials, including Salomé Pradas, the head of the emergency department, had provided misleading information regarding the alert system’s activation. Pradas's claims that there was a lack of communication about the potential need for alerts have come under fire, especially as evidence suggested discussions about mass population warnings had begun much earlier in the day.
The situation has further escalated due to Mazón's perceived isolation. He recently spent eight hours at the Emergency Center with only three of his key aides, shutting out councilors and regional leaders from vital discussions. The lack of a clear communication strategy and indecisive actions during the initial hours of the disaster have raised questions regarding Mazón's leadership capabilities.
With the region still in recovery mode, calls for accountability are growing louder. The controversies surrounding Mazón's decisions during DANA continue to jeopardize his political future, as not even the leadership of the PP stands resolutely behind him in the face of public discontent and criticism. As the crisis unfolds, it remains to be seen whether Mazón can regain the trust of his constituents and party members alike.
Related Sources: