Controversial Aid Distribution Plan for Gaza Raises Doubts Amid Humanitarian Crisis
Last week, Mike Huckabee, the United States ambassador to Israel, unveiled a contentious plan aimed at resuming the distribution of vital food and medicines within the Gaza Strip, which has been severely impacted by an Israeli blockade since March 2. Formulated in collaboration with Israel, this initiative faces significant opposition, with critics labeling it as incomplete and largely unfeasible. It proposes that aid be distributed through private organizations while involving mass relocations of the Palestinian populace.
On Tuesday, Tom Fletcher, who leads the UN’s humanitarian aid program, criticized the plan, characterizing it as a deliberate distraction from the deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
A community kitchen in the southern Gaza Strip is emblematic of the ongoing struggle. Under the proposed project, a private entity named the Humanitarian Foundation for Gaza would oversee aid distribution, protected by US contractors or private military firms, while the Israeli army would remain outside these areas to avoid direct interaction with Palestinians. The organizations that would actually carry out the aid distribution are currently unspecified, and the proactive involvement of United Nations workers and UNRWA—the UN agency responsible for Palestinian refugees—has been excluded, further raising concerns over the legitimacy and efficacy of the plan.
The timeline for the program's implementation is still unknown, whereas nearly two million Palestinians in Gaza remain effectively besieged and subject to daily bombardment, with conditions deteriorating rapidly. Supplies from the World Food Program (WFP), UNRWA, and NGOs still operating within the Strip have reportedly been depleted, leaving the population in dire need of assistance.
Currently, more than 116,000 tons of aid sit outside Gaza's borders, yet Israel has resisted mounting international pressure to allow access, asserting that the blockade serves as leverage against Hamas. Israel claims, without providing substantial evidence, that Hamas allegedly exploits humanitarian aid to consolidate its control over the territory, a rationale that many critics view as a clear violation of international humanitarian law.
According to the plans laid out by the US and Israel, there would be four major distribution areas, ostensibly serving approximately 300,000 individuals each, potentially reaching up to 1.2 million Palestinians—a mere 60% of the population. Residents would have to visit these distribution centers weekly to receive a package sufficient for just one week. Precise locations for these distribution points remain unclear, but they are likely to be concentrated in southern Gaza, aligning with an Israeli strategy that has controversially sought to shift the entirety of the Palestinian population southward for potential occupation of other areas.
AP Photo credits highlight the ongoing human struggle in the region. The UN and various NGOs have expressed grave reservations about this proposed approach. According to the UN, prior to the current crisis, there were approximately 400 distribution points for aid. Consolidating them into just four would significantly hinder access for individuals with limited mobility and force many to travel great distances for assistance. This plan, by design, excludes around 40% of the population from receiving essential support.
Moreover, Huckabee himself acknowledged that numerous operational details pertaining to the plan remain undefined. Experts claim that establishing the first distribution points could take at least two weeks, a timeline perceived as overly optimistic given the intensity of the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe. Operators currently distributing necessary goods in the Strip assert that the proposed timelines are far too long considering the immediate and worsening needs of the local population.
Related Sources: