Controversial Decision to Downgrade Wolf Protection Sparks Conservation Alarm
European wolves, once teetering on the brink of extinction, are set to lose their strict legal protection status, a move that has conservationists deeply alarmed. On Tuesday, a committee dedicated to wildlife preservation voted to support a proposal from the European Union that lessens protections for wolves, thereby easing regulations that allow for their shooting. This measure has been proposed under the guise of protecting livestock, as the EU estimates a staggering 65,000 domestic animals are killed by wolves every year, which were originally intended for human consumption.
The decision to downgrade the wolf's protection status was welcomed by hunting groups but has ignited outrage among environmental organizations. Marta Klimkiewicz from ClientEarth lamented that this decision effectively grants a 'green light' to hunting wolves under the guise of conservation. Meanwhile, Sofie Ruysschaert from BirdLife Europe expressed concern that this could reverse decades of progress made in European conservation efforts.
Historically, wolves were eradicated from a significant portion of Europe during the 19th and 20th centuries. However, thanks to habitat protections, their numbers have rebounded, with an estimated 20,000 wolves currently roaming the continent. Increased tensions between farmers and wolves, primarily due to livestock predation, have led to calls for culling these animals in rural areas.
In a recent incident, a male grey wolf named GW950m made headlines last September when it entered a paddock and killed a pony owned by Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission. Von der Leyen stated that the change in wolf protection status was crucial for rural communities and farmers, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach between wildlife preservation and agricultural interests.
In light of the decision, conservationists are advocating for non-lethal methods of coexistence. Suggestions include the use of guard dogs and electric fences to deter wolves from livestock. Experts warn that culling could inadvertently cause more harm by disrupting wolf packs, which can lead to solitary wolves scavenging for food in farms, increasing livestock losses.
Sabien Leemans from WWF articulated that the downgrade of the wolf's protection status for political reasons, especially against scientific evidence, jeopardizes decades of conservation efforts. A 2018 assessment by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) indicated that three out of nine wolf populations in the EU are vulnerable, with three additional populations classified as near threatened. Current evaluations by the Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe have further elevated concerns, suggesting that five wolf populations are near threatened and one is vulnerable.
Despite scientists asserting that the overall wolf population in Europe is healthy enough to withstand a selective culling, they caution that localized actions could push vulnerable populations over the brink. Luigi Boitani, a zoologist from Sapienza University in Rome and an expert with the Large Carnivore Initiative, noted that while localized culling might not harm the species as a whole, the implications of such actions depend heavily on the approach and locations chosen for these interventions.
The wolf has become a focal point of rural dissent against environmental regulations, particularly as reports of sheep attacks rise. Last year, Switzerland attempted to follow a similar path to downgrade wolf protections but failed to garner sufficient backing. Recently, farmers in Switzerland protested by dumping sheep carcasses outside government buildings to press for more stringent measures against wolves.
This recent change initiated by the EU, which was passed with a two-thirds majority in the Council of Europe, comes in the wake of concessions made by European politicians in response to farmer protests this year. Unless a third of the member parties object, the new regulations will come into force within three months, compelling the EU to revise its protected habitats directive.
As Boitani stated, 'If we could count on logic and rationality and scientific rigor, this decision would not be dangerous.' Yet, he acknowledges that discussions surrounding wolves often gravitate towards emotion rather than science.
Related Sources: