Controversies Erupt as Javier Milei's LIBRA Cryptocurrency Collapses
The recent collapse of the cryptocurrency LIBRA, which was heavily promoted on social media by Argentine President Javier Milei, has ignited a political firestorm in Argentina, complete with legal repercussions and controversy over the president's involvement.
LIBRA launched on a Friday amid considerable fanfare, initially skyrocketing in value before plummeting, leading to substantial financial losses for approximately 40,000 Argentinians. The cryptocurrency's failure has raised serious questions regarding the role of its promoters, particularly the little-known American entrepreneur Hayden Mark Davis, CEO of Kelsier Ventures. Despite his anonymity in the crypto world, Davis has reportedly met with Milei multiple times, frequently liaising with influential figures close to the president, including his sister, Karina, who acts as a key advisor.
Characterized as a meme coin, LIBRA draws inspiration from popular culture phenomena, akin to others like TRUMP and MELANIA. Such cryptocurrencies are acknowledged to be highly volatile and are seen as speculative investments, making them particularly risky for investors. Within mere hours of Milei's endorsement on X (formerly Twitter), LIBRA's value surged from mere cents to approximately 45 euros, prompting early investors to cash out at an astounding profit of 90 million euros.
However, the euphoria was short-lived; the value rapidly spiraled downward, leading to accusations that the initiative might constitute a 'rug pull,' a term used to describe a scam where promoters abandon a project, leaving investors with nearly worthless assets. As the dust settled, it became evident that only a handful of early promoters turned a profit, while the majority faced total loss.
The driving forces behind LIBRA included KIP Protocol, led by Julien Peh, an Argentinian-Singaporean national, and Kelsier Ventures, the venture where Davis operates alongside his father. Milei's public association with Davis, particularly a meeting post he shared in late January, became a focal point for criticism. Questions arose as to how Davis, alongside Peh, secured such access to the Argentine leadership.
Reports indicate that a central figure linking Davis with Milei was Mauricio Novelli, the owner of NW Professional Traders, a financial education company. Milei had previously taught courses for NW, leading to Novelli's recurring visits to the presidential palace, Casa Rosada.
Compounding the controversy, messages allegedly from Davis surfaced, suggesting he had a degree of influence over Milei—claiming to facilitate meetings and promotions in exchange for financial support to the president's sister. Although Davis later refuted these allegations through a spokesperson, stating no payments were involved, the gravity of the situation prompted urgent discussions within Argentine political circles about the ease with which the LIBRA initiative connected to Milei.
Interestingly, Milei isn’t new to controversial endorsements—his prior promotion of cryptocurrency products during his time as a deputy led to accusations of fraud and unethical practices in the CoinX case. Furthermore, American entrepreneur Charles Hoskinson has publicly shared experiences in which intermediaries offered to arrange a meeting with Milei for monetary considerations.
Milei’s administration faces increasing scrutiny over the simplicity with which dubious promoters seemed to exploit his position. Following the cryptocurrency’s collapse, a chaotic media interview further deepened the president's predicament. Footage revealed that a collaborator interrupted a journalist's pressing inquiries, focused on Milei’s endorsement of LIBRA, questioning whether it was as president or merely as an individual. Milei countered these concerns by suggesting that any legal ramifications would be handled by Justice Minister Mariano Cúneo Libarona, a statement that critics argue could suggest potential conflicts of interest.
For many in Argentina, this incident raises more than just financial implications; it encapsulates broader political issues of trust, systemic vulnerability, and the responsibilities of public office within emerging digital economies. As investigations unfold, citizens are left grappling with the implications of unregulated cryptocurrency operations and a government eager to navigate this complex landscape.
Related Sources: