COP29 Kicks Off in Baku: Climate Finance in the Spotlight
On Monday, the 29th United Nations Conference on Climate Change, known as COP29, commenced in Baku, Azerbaijan, and will continue until November 22. This year’s discussions will primarily focus on climate finance, the economic assistance that developed nations, historically responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, have pledged to offer to less developed countries.
Simon Stiell, the Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), emphasized during the opening event that climate finance should not be viewed merely as charity. He asserted that establishing an ambitious climate finance target is in the self-interest of all nations, including the wealthiest.
In COP lingo, the focal point in Azerbaijan is the New Climate Financial Goal (NCQG). At COP15 in Copenhagen back in 2009, developed countries, including members of the European Union, the United States, and others, pledged to raise $100 billion by 2020 to aid emission reductions and climate adaptation in developing nations. This commitment was extended for five years following the Paris Agreement in 2015 and is now due for renewal.
Countries at the United Nations must not only determine how much funding will be allocated in the coming years but also clarify the sources of these funds—whether from government bodies or private entities. There’s also ongoing debate about the format of this financing, whether it should be given as grants or, as has been customary, as interest-bearing loans. Historically, funds have mainly supported mitigation projects like renewable energy facilities, while adaptation initiatives have received comparatively minor funding. A lack of clarity remains on how to distribute these funds effectively.
Developing countries are advocating for a portion of the new funds to specifically address damages caused by climate change, such as extreme flooding and droughts. However, wealthier nations argue that financing for losses and damages should be treated separately; a fund dedicated to this purpose was agreed upon at COP28 in Dubai in 2023.
As negotiations unfold in Baku, another pressing issue will be determining which countries should contribute to climate initiatives aimed at the least economically developed nations. Historically, support has come primarily from members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
In recent years, the European Union and the Biden administration have worked to include other rapidly developing nations, particularly China, the largest emitter of greenhouse gases today, in the climate finance conversation.
COPs are moments where climate negotiations receive heightened scrutiny, but talks surrounding the NCQG have been ongoing throughout the year. Recent discussions reveal a deep division among countries regarding how to shape the new financial goal, which originally aimed for a $100 billion target—set somewhat arbitrarily in 2009. This figure has proven insufficient, especially considering it was only fully achieved in 2022. Estimates regarding the financing needs of developing nations vary significantly. However, there seems to be general agreement about the requirement being in the thousands of billions annually.
The UNFCCC’s Standing Committee on Finance conducted some assessments, suggesting that developing countries will need around $59 trillion over the next five years. However, this figure is seen as notably incomplete, reflecting the complexity involved in establishing a clear financial target.
Diverse opinions on what should be included in this new goal complicate discussions. While developing nations prefer financing primarily from public funds provided by wealthier countries, richer countries argue for more private sector involvement to reduce the burden on national budgets. After struggling to meet the previous target of $100 billion, these nations stress the need for a more realistic framework for funding requests from developing countries.
Moreover, the Biden administration has clarified that developed nations have not explicitly committed to fulfilling all the needs of developing countries, only to account for them in discussions. A complex negotiation lies ahead as countries must identify who will contribute to this new goal. Various analyses have proposed a range of new contributors, including high-GDP nations and oil producers such as the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Kuwait, as well as countries with high-income populations like Israel and South Korea.
Despite being classified as a developing country, China's contribution is debated, particularly given its lag in historical and per capita emissions compared to more developed nations.
One proposed solution to these challenges is to categorize the New Climate Financial Goal based on different purposes and contributions to bridge the gap in expectations and capabilities among nations.
As these discussions progress, a potential political shift looms on the horizon. The recent election of Donald Trump as U.S. president may influence COP negotiations, as he has historically been skeptical about climate change and has previously withdrawn the U.S. from international agreements on the issue. How this new leadership will affect ongoing climate finance debates remains uncertain, but it will surely play a role in shaping the outcomes of COP29.
Related Sources: