Dutch Government's Controversial Immigration Strategy Sparks EU Tensions
The newly formed Dutch coalition government, led by Geert Wilders' far-right Freedom Party (PVV), seems to be heading towards a significant confrontation with the European Union regarding immigration policies. The coalition has formally requested an opt-out from EU asylum rules, a move that could redefine the Netherlands' approach to migration in what is perceived as a departure from collective EU agreements.
On Wednesday, the country's asylum and migration minister, Marjolein Faber, announced on X (formerly Twitter) that she had informed the European Commission of their desire for an exemption from migration policies across Europe. "We have to be in charge of our own asylum policy once more," she asserted, emphasizing a push for stricter control over immigration.
The coalition, which took office in July following elections last November, promises to introduce what it claims will be the toughest immigration policies in Dutch history. This is a dramatic commitment that is likely to be met with resistance not only from Brussels but also from various capital cities across Europe. All 27 EU member states, including the Netherlands, had previously agreed to a new EU-wide migration and asylum pact late last year after extensive discussions, making the Dutch request particularly contentious.
European Commission spokesperson Eric Mamer explained that opting out of adopted legislation would contradict a fundamental principle governing EU operations. Experts echo this sentiment, suggesting that a Dutch opt-out is only feasible through the amendment of existing treaties—something that is viewed as implausible given that this could lead to an unequal distribution of asylum seekers among member states.
Denmark, Ireland, and Poland have negotiated opt-outs from certain EU regulations in the past, but those exceptions were built into the treaty discussions. The current Dutch request, on the other hand, is viewed as unlikely to gain traction and may set a precedent for other anti-immigration governments to follow suit.
Additionally, the call for an opt-out is being made in conjunction with the government's aim to declare a national asylum crisis, which would empower them to enact significantly more stringent immigration measures without parliamentary permission. Among these proposed policies are a halt on new asylum applications, limitations on family member visas for granted asylum seekers, the intention to maintain minimal living conditions for asylum seekers, and rapid deportation for those deemed ineligible for asylum.
During a presentation of this policy last Friday, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof voiced concerns over the country's ability to manage the heightened influx of migrants. Meanwhile, King Willem-Alexander highlighted the government's ambition to establish a streamlined, tougher, and limited asylum system in a recent address to parliament.
However, legal experts have questioned whether the Netherlands' asylum system can legitimately be labeled as being in crisis. They argue that its issues stem primarily from poor funding decisions made by the government rather than from external pressures like war or natural disaster. Data from the EU showed that last year, the Netherlands received an average of two first-time asylum applications per 1,000 residents, a figure that aligns with the EU average. This rate is lower than that of ten EU member states, including Greece, Germany, and Spain.
Challenging fiscal management has led to overburdening the sole registration center for asylum seekers in Ter Apel, often leaving individuals stranded and forced to sleep outdoors due to inadequate facilities.
The PVV triggered a political upheaval in the previous elections by finishing first, although Wilders faced challenges forming a stable government. He had to retract several extreme proposals, such as a ban on mosques and the Quran, as well as the controversial Nexit referendum on leaving the EU.
Now, mere months into its term, signs of discord are emerging within the coalition, which comprises the populist farmers' party BBB, the right-wing liberal VVD, and the anti-corruption NSC party. NSC acting leader Nicolien van Vroonhoven announced that her party's MPs would not support the proposed immigration measures unless they were entirely validated by the Netherlands' top consultative body, the Council of State. Wilders, incensed by the pushback, declared on X that the ongoing asylum scenario in the Netherlands is a genuine crisis that will not be resolved by evading responsibility or threatening to vote against crucial measures.
As the tension between the Dutch coalition and EU mounts, it remains uncertain how this conflict of interests will unfold and how it will impact not only Dutch policy but also the wider European Union's approach to migration.
Related Sources: