Europe's Role in Peacekeeping: Tensions and Unease Amidst Ukrainian Conflict

The recent appearances of US Vice President J.D. Vance at the Munich Security Conference and the meeting of US and Russian foreign ministers in Riyadh have raised significant concerns among European governments. These developments have sparked intensifying discussions on how a potential peacekeeping operation in Ukraine might be structured and what role Europe could play.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced on Sunday that the UK could send troops to Ukraine for peacekeeping if necessary. A recent Forsa Institute poll revealed that a small majority of Germans support the participation of German troops in a possible peacekeeping mission. However, Chancellor Olaf Scholz has expressed hesitation about any such involvement, describing the discussion around it as "extremely inappropriate" and "premature."

Scholz warned against creating a rift within NATO, emphasizing that Europe should not engage in scenarios where American security interests diverge, such as deploying European troops without full US involvement. He firmly stated that deploying NATO troops prior to a ceasefire is out of the question, as it could embroil the alliance further in the ongoing conflict.

The timing of these discussions is crucial, as Germany is on the brink of a Bundestag election. With indications suggesting that Friedrich Merz is likely to succeed Scholz, he has yet to take a firm stance on peacekeeping in Ukraine. During a recent TV debate, Merz deflected a question about sending troops, arguing that such considerations are premature at this stage.

Adding to the complexity, a significant condition posited by Merz for Germany's participation in a peacekeeping mission is a "flawless international legal mandate," alongside a consensus with Russia, which poses challenges given the current situation. His party, the CDU, emphasizes the need to first create the right conditions before taking concrete steps towards deploying peacekeeping troops, as there remains no ceasefire or visible path toward equitable peace.

There is a growing sense of urgency among CDU members who note that Germany must play a pivotal role in stabilizing Europe in light of the current geopolitical landscape, which they see as increasingly threatened by the US's apparent dismantlement of the post-World War II order. CDU foreign policy expert Norbert Röttgen articulated concerns that the erosion of shared values between nations has brought Europe to a precipice, underscoring the need for decisive action.

CDU defense politician Johann Wadephul observed that while Germany aims to contribute significantly to Ukraine's security, current military readiness and limitations hinder the feasibility of sending troops to Ukraine. The Bundeswehr struggles to manage ongoing smaller deployments, with Army Inspector Alfons Mais noting a significant depletion of resources since the Russian invasion.

Military analysts suggest that any peacekeeping mission would require an extensive troop presence—potentially upwards of 150,000 soldiers—to effectively deter further Russian aggression. American strategic adjustments have only clouded the situation further. Following recent US-Russian dialogues, security expert Christian Mölling pointed out that without a proactive stance on defense, Europe risks failing to grasp the seriousness of the ongoing conflict.

Meanwhile, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock articulated skepticism regarding the peacekeeping troop discussions, questioning whether Europe is inadvertently being drawn into a game favoring Russian interests, particularly due to the ambiguous position of the current US administration.

As discussions continue, the landscape appears rife with uncertainty. The fundamental question remains: How can Europe assert its role in maintaining peace and security in a region undergoing such profound stress, especially in light of the evolving global dynamics? The coming days will be critical as European nations navigate these challenges and define their collective response to the crisis in Ukraine.

Related Sources:

• Source 1 • Source 2 • Source 3