German Court Rules Birkenstock Sandals Are Design Objects, Not Works of Art
On Wednesday, Germany's Federal Court of Justice delivered a pivotal ruling that certain iconic sandal models from Birkenstock do not qualify as works of art, but rather as design objects. This judgement implications significantly affect the level of protection these products receive under German copyright law. Birkenstock had previously initiated legal action against several competitors—namely the German company Tchibo, the Danish retailer Bestseller, and the American firm Shoes.com—accusing them of copying four of its renowned sandal models.
The court concluded that Birkenstock's claims lacked merit, determining that had these models been deemed works of art, they would have gained a higher level of protection against imitation by rival brands.
Following the verdict, Birkenstock’s legal representatives indicated that the company would seek alternative legal avenues, emphasizing the need to uphold the recognizable and distinctive design of their sandals, although no specific plans were detailed.
The crux of this ruling rests on the German legal distinction between art and design, where the purpose of a product plays a crucial role. According to local laws, products classified as design items prioritize functionality, while works of art are viewed through the lens of artistic expression that is unbridled by commercial intent.
This recent ruling is a significant shift in copyright protection standards. Art works enjoy 70 years of copyright protection following the author's death, while design copyrights last only 25 years from the date of creation. Some of Birkenstock's best-known designs date back to the 1970s, meaning they are now in the public domain.
The implications of this ruling could resonate throughout the fashion and design industries, where the line between artistic creativity and commercial viability is often blurred. While other mass-produced items have previously been granted art status under copyright—such as certain models from Porsche and various designs from the Bauhaus movement—this landmark decision signals a re-evaluation of that status.
Birkenstock's desire to have its sandals classified as art in the eyes of the law has not yet been fulfilled, but the company appears poised to continue its legal fight to protect its iconic designs from competitors. As the landscape of design and copyright law evolves, the decision underscores the necessity for companies to navigate this distinction carefully in efforts to safeguard their intellectual property.
Related Sources: