Inbreeding in Literary Criticism: A Deeper Look at the Connections in Swedish Literature
This week's literary discourse revolves around a provocative inquiry posed by the magazine Kvartal: is literary criticism inbred? The question arises from an investigation by bibliometrician Lars Kullman, who sheds light on the intricate web of relationships among critics, authors, and publishing personnel within the seemingly small literary scene of Sweden.
Kullman's study delves into the practice of guest reviews, where an author, aligned with a particular newspaper, solicits an external critic to provide a review. Through sentiment analysis of these guest reviews, Kullman surprisingly finds that a staggering 80 percent are positive. However, this number lacks context as there are no comparative statistics available for standard reviews, leaving readers curious if this positivity suggests genuine appreciation or a tacit agreement to maintain a pleasant community.
In an effort to visualize this criticism network, Kullman presents a mind map of 144 individuals connected through their reviews—creating a circle of literary relationships that hints at both friendship and competition. While the map identifies prominent critics such as Göran Greider, Fredrik Sjöberg, Annina Rabe, and Petter Lindgren, it ultimately raises more questions than answers about the integrity of cultural discussions.
The small sample of critics suggests a close-knit community, but interpretations of their relationships vary. Are they simply allies working to uplift literary standards, or is there an underlying agenda reminiscent of a 'human centipede' of interconnected ambitions? As Kullman's report gains traction, the discourse surrounding the integrity of literary criticism has largely been subdued, aside from Kristin McMillen's criticism of DNs book list, which prompted Jonas Thente to defend the organization against allegations of corruption. This brings us to ponder who will contribute guest reviews or participate in book listings if the criticisms are predominantly emitted from a handful of individuals.
Additionally, the cultural landscape this week has pitched its fair share of drama. Notably, the controversial replacement of the artist behind the facade of the musical character Fröken Snusk by producer Rasmus Gozzi has instigated concert cancellations, with claims swirling around the idea of 'fake Miss' tarnishing the reputation of the original artist.
In entertainment highlights, the prestigious Cannes Film Festival has bestowed a glimmer of hope on director Tarik Saleh, who aims for the Palme d’Or with his new project 'Eagles of the Republic,' featuring actor Fares Fares. Critics have lauded a variety of artistic expressions this week: from a coming-of-age film steeped in magical realism to a gripping thriller by Hanna Johansson, not forgetting the soulful fusion in Greentea Peng's latest album. Each of these artistic expressions adds to the kaleidoscope of culture flowing through Swedish media.
The cultural conversation takes a lighter turn with readers offering amusing anecdotes through DN's 'Disturbance line,' voicing minor irritations in film and television portrayals. Readers question the commonly encountered scenarios in which characters read only the beginning or middle of books on screen, as well as the inexplicable reappearance of the same horses in the series 'Vikings'—a pet peeve to those with a keen eye for detail. Even language usage has come under scrutiny as readers express confusion at the trending phrase 'sick' to denote excellence.
In reflection, the week in cultural discourse has unveiled complexities behind literary criticisms, while also celebrating the artistry and humor embedded in our collective experiences. As we navigate through these insights, the question remains not just of literary inbreeding, but of how audiences engage with the narratives and the storytellers themselves.
Related Sources: