International Court of Justice Agrees to Hear Armenia-Azerbaijan Dispute Over Nagorno-Karabakh
On November 12, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) announced its jurisdiction to address the conflicting cases submitted by Armenia and Azerbaijan concerning the contentious Nagorno-Karabakh region. This significant ruling was reached by the 17-judge panel of the Hague-based court and was unanimous in nature.
Armenia’s case, which was filed in September 2021, contends that Azerbaijan has violated the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) and has engaged in ethnic cleansing within the region. In response, Azerbaijan has refuted these claims and has submitted a counterclaim, accusing Armenia of promoting hate speech and disseminating racist propaganda.
The focus of the ongoing legal battles is Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous area that is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan but has been predominantly inhabited by ethnic Armenians. Historical tensions flared between the nations, resulting in wars in the early 1990s and again in 2020 for control over the territory. A dramatic turn of events occurred in September 2023 when Azerbaijan conducted a swift, one-day offensive, reclaiming the territory and forcing nearly the entire ethnic Armenian population—approximately 100,000 people—to seek refuge in Armenia.
The ICJ, recognized as the United Nations' highest tribunal for adjudicating disputes between states, had previously issued emergency orders back in December 2021, urging both nations to refrain from inciting or promoting racial hatred. Since then, the court has reviewed numerous motions initiated by both parties related to their respective lawsuits. Following the recent developments in Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia returned to the court in 2023, seeking justice and accountability.
While the court's orders are binding, it is crucial to note that the ICJ lacks direct enforcement capabilities. As of now, no specific date has been announced for the forthcoming hearings regarding the rival cases. However, legal experts anticipate that a comprehensive ruling on the substantive merits of the cases may take several years.
The ongoing legal confrontation highlights the complex historical and ethnic issues surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh and raises critical questions surrounding international law, human rights accountability, and the response mechanisms available to address allegations of racial discrimination and ethnic conflict. As the situation continues to evolve, the global community watches closely to see how the ICJ’s involvement might influence the resolutions of this entrenched dispute.
Related Sources: