Italy's Controversial Migration Decree: The Safe Countries Dilemma
The Italian Council of Ministers recently approved a legislative decree establishing a list of so-called safe countries of origin for migrants. This list includes 22 nations that the government has deemed secure enough that asylum applications from their citizens undergo expedited procedures while the applicants remain in detention. However, the decree’s text is not yet public, and its implications are already igniting serious debates.
This list mirrors one released earlier this year under an interministerial decree. However, the current legislative decree, which carries more political and institutional weight, signals Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's administration's intent to maintain the operation of newly opened migrant centers in Albania. These centers were recently involved in a ruling from a Rome court that ordered the release of 12 asylum seekers who had been sent there, arguing they come from countries that are not genuinely safe.
The release order from the Rome court faced sharp backlash from the government, which accused elements of the judiciary of undermining its policies. The court's ruling was based on a previous decision from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which asserts that European nations must respect human rights universally across their entire territory when determining whether a country can be classified as safe.
This raises questions about the validity of the Italian government's designation of certain countries, including Egypt and Bangladesh, as safe for asylum seekers. These nations have been criticized for human rights abuses, particularly against political activists and the LGBTQ community, leading many to argue that the designation fails to meet the criteria set forth by the CJEU and the European directive established in 2013.
The directive permits expedited processing for individuals from countries where there are no valid reasons to flee, but only if those countries have a consistent record of human rights protections. Legal scholars have already raised doubts about the government's reasoning, noting that strong legal precedents challenge the notion of 'safe countries' as defined by the Italian administration.
As the government seeks to fortify its legal standing with this new decree, uncertainties linger regarding its ability to effectively manage the migrant centers in Albania. Significant financial investments are needed, but the legal framework remains precarious. This situation epitomizes the ongoing struggle within Italy regarding migration policy, human rights, and the interplay between national and European laws.
As the political landscape evolves, the implications of this legislative decree will likely provoke further scrutiny and debate, impacting not only the lives of migrants but also Italy's relationship with the EU and its own judiciary.
Related Sources: