Lebanon's Shift: A New Political Era Amidst Hezbollah's Decline

In a dramatic turn of events, Lebanese politics is witnessing a pivotal moment as the once formidable power of Hezbollah diminishes. Mohammad Raad, a deputy of the Shiite faction, remarked on Monday that "we have taken a positive step by electing the president and have extended our hand," signaling a desire for cooperation. However, this offer has not garnered support from Lebanon's Christian, Sunni, and Druze representatives, highlighting a significant shift in the country's political landscape.

Historically, Hezbollah has wielded considerable power within Lebanon, functioning almost as a state within a state due to its military and political strength. Yet, the recent tone from its parliamentary members reflects a stark reality: their influence is waning. Many local politicians and activists now regard this moment as one of Lebanon's greatest opportunities, particularly regarding the disarmament of Hezbollah, which has long posed a challenge to national stability.

Hezbollah's decision to align with Hamas during the recent conflict with Israel on October 7, 2023, proved catastrophic. Following Israel's retaliatory actions, including the assassination of Hezbollah's leader Hasan Nasrallah, the organization has suffered significant losses. By early December, further chaos ensued as the Syrian regime faltered, severing Hezbollah's crucial supply lines to Iran and destabilizing its support network.

Amidst this turmoil, Lebanon's opportunity for change has been embraced. On Friday, army chief Joseph Aoun was elected as the new president. Initially, Hezbollah refrained from voting but later engaged with Aoun, indicating hopes for political compromises, particularly concerning disarmament—an issue the UN has pressed for over many years.

A distinct shift in momentum became evident when Nawaf Salam, the former president of the International Court of Justice, was nominated as prime minister—a candidate long favored by reformists but historically blocked by Hezbollah.

Nevertheless, while Hezbollah appears diminished, it remains a potent force, still retaining a significant arsenal despite Israel's claims of reducing its capabilities. For decades, Hezbollah has fortified itself with support from Tehran, and disarming this group poses complex challenges for the new government.

The disarmament of Hezbollah is fraught with risks. President Aoun and Prime Minister Salam face a delicate balancing act: forcibly neutralizing Hezbollah could reignite civil strife, particularly as many members of the Lebanese army are Shia, reflecting the sectarian fabric of the country. This leaves two primary options: either integrate Hezbollah fighters into the national army or develop a cohesive national defense strategy that unites various factions under a common cause.

In tandem with these political maneuvers, the new leadership must instill confidence among Lebanon’s Shiite population, showcasing that the state can secure their needs. The reconstruction of homes destroyed in conflict is urgent, with Hezbollah historically providing substantial financial support post-war. However, the current economic turmoil facing Iran limits Hezbollah’s ability to assist, exacerbating distrust among the Shiite community.

The recent emergence of Aoun and Salam was partly backed by foreign powers, notably the USA and Saudi Arabia, signaling a possible shift in alliances. Saudi Arabia, previously disillusioned with Lebanese politics, now sees an opening to counter Iran's regional influence while potentially stabilizing Lebanon against Turkey's rising power.

The promise of Gulf financial support looms large, as countries like the UAE express interest in being involved in Lebanon's reconstruction. This need for aid, however, contrasts with the requirement for Lebanon's leadership to maintain autonomy and not become marionettes of foreign powers—a challenge they must navigate carefully.

In his inaugural address, Prime Minister Salam extended his hand to all political factions, reaffirming a commitment to collaboration for the betterment of the nation. This gesture might symbolize the path forward as Lebanon grapples with its fractured identity and strives to overcome the vestiges of Hezbollah’s long-standing dominance.

Related Sources:

• Source 1 • Source 2