Lessons from Brexit: Moldova's EU Referendum and the Shadow of Russian Influence
Having witnessed two significant EU referendums in my life—Brexit and Moldova's recent vote on EU integration—I can’t help but draw parallels between the two experiences. As an EU national in the UK, I was unable to participate in the Brexit referendum in 2016, and I recall the collective disbelief amongst many as the results unfolded. I learned of the outcome while traveling in Spain, surrounded by a British national who also couldn't cast a ballot. My London-based friends expressed feelings of alienation, as if their country had been irreparably split in two. This haunting memory resurfaced as I followed the results of Moldova's referendum on October 20.
Leading up to the vote, opinion polls suggested a promising support for EU integration among Moldovans, particularly in urban centers and among the diaspora. Enthusiasm filled my social circle, as we eagerly posted our 'I voted blue' stickers on social media, hopeful for a favorable outcome. However, as the initial results rolled in, I felt a sinking despair. The anti-EU vote appeared to have garnered significant traction, a sentiment that lingered for hours. I found myself reflecting on the distinctions between Moldova and the UK; specifically, the discrepancies between urban and rural voting behaviors.
In Moldova, similar to the scenario played out in the Brexit vote, regions that historically benefited from EU funds, such as Cahul and Ungheni, leaned towards the anti-EU vote. It was disheartening to see that in Chișinău, business districts and areas traditionally populated by Russian speakers contributed to the dissent.
One elderly voter outside my polling station starkly highlighted the disconnect when she questioned the referendum's purpose. The prevailing sentiment suggested skepticism towards Maia Sandu, the incumbent president, with accusations that her push for the referendum was more about securing her position than genuinely advancing the nation's EU aspirations. Some pro-European voters opted to boycott the referendum altogether. Ultimately, the pro-European vote barely scraped through with 50.46% of nearly 1.5 million ballots cast.
As anticipation built for the upcoming presidential second round on November 3—where Sandu will face off against former prosecutor general Alexandr Stoianoglo—concerns have emerged regarding external influence, especially from pro-Russian factions. Ilan Shor, a fugitive oligarch living in Russia, has faced allegations of orchestrating a campaign to undermine Moldova's EU path while offering financial incentives for anti-EU sentiments through social media and various other platforms.
The accumulating evidence of voting manipulation—where Sandu cited potential vote manipulation through organized crime amounting to over 300,000 voters—has not gone unnoticed. Both national and international observers have condemned Russia's meddling, echoing the sentiments we felt during Brexit.
Yet, the underlying challenges residing within Moldova are eerily reminiscent of those seen in the UK, stemming from a complicated historical narrative, longstanding Russian influence, and public disillusionment. The pervasive reach of Russian media and propaganda within Moldova highlights significant vulnerabilities, ones that must be addressed by the country's leadership to maintain its European trajectory. As Moldova gears up for a pivotal political season, international assistance becomes ever more critical in combating foreign interference and ensuring democratic processes are upheld.
With the parallels between Moldova's referendum experience and Brexit underscored, it stands clear that the road to EU integration is fraught with challenges. The values and policies of the European Union must resonate with the citizenry while effectively countering the predatory influences external to its borders. Now more than ever, it is crucial for Moldova to galvanize support from its allies to safeguard its sovereignty and aspirations of a European future.
Related Sources: