MEP Alvise Pérez Admits Guilt Over Tax Evasion and Encourages Noncompliance
In a shocking revelation, Alvise Pérez, a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) from the group Se Acabó La Fiesta, openly confessed to receiving payment for his freelance work without the necessary invoicing procedures. This moment of candor took place during a video posted on his Telegram channel, following a formal complaint lodged against him by the Attorney General, which has now escalated to the Supreme Court. The situation has emerged amidst allegations linking Pérez to a pyramid scheme associated with Madeira Invest.
According to the official complaint, Pérez purportedly accepted a staggering €100,000 from the controversial company to promote their investment platform at various public events. In his defense, he minimized the gravity of the accusations, referring to his off-the-books income as a mere lack of VAT on an otherwise legitimate bill, which he claimed was part of a strategy to save money rather than to exploit his position for personal gain.
Pérez's remarks raise serious ethical questions, as he did not shy away from encouraging his followers to embrace tax noncompliance, suggesting that circumventing tax regulations could offer them financial benefits. His defiant stance seems to imply that he believes he can evade serious repercussions, asserting that the negative reports circulating about him amount to nothing more than slander without substantial evidence from the Tax Agency.
While this statement has stirred considerable outrage among political circles and the general public, it highlights the ongoing issues of transparency and accountability among elected officials. The implications of his admission could have far-reaching consequences not only for his political career but also for the integrity of public office holders in Europe.
As this case unfolds, it is essential for the institutions involved to uphold the principles of justice and ensure that there are no double standards when it comes to enforcing tax laws. The public's trust in political figures is at stake, and the outcome of this investigation will undoubtedly set a precedent for how similar cases are handled in the future.
Related Sources: