Migration Crisis in Europe: Asylum Law Under Scrutiny Amid Geopolitical Tensions
As Sweden's Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson prepares to address the EU summit this Thursday and Friday, the issue of migration has once again surged to the forefront. Recently, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced a temporary suspension of the right to asylum in Poland, a significant move attributed to allegations that Russia and Belarus are deliberately inflating the number of asylum seekers entering the country. Similarly, Finland has enacted restrictions along its eastern border, citing comparable concerns.
Kristersson has voiced strong support for both Poland and Finland, asserting that the actions of Belarus and Russia to weaponize migration represent a clear threat to the stability of European democracies. "This has nothing to do with conventions. It is an unreasonable way to exploit democracies’ willingness to do the right thing," Kristersson stated, illustrating the rising tension in the geopolitical landscape.
The phenomenon of increased migration sparked by actions within and against European nations raises critical questions about the current framework of international asylum law. Finland's President Alexander Stubb has proposed that a reassessment of asylum law is necessary, given its evident inability to cope with the manipulation of migration for geopolitical gain. He emphasizes that asylum legislation must adapt to current realities that starkly differ from the post-World War II context in which many of these laws were formed.
Last spring, the EU made advances in establishing a new asylum and migration pact aimed at streamlining the process of migration to the continent. The pact primarily seeks to ensure that those entitled to asylum are granted protections, while those who are not are quickly informed and asked to leave. However, early signs indicate that solidarity within the EU on this issue is crumbling.
The newly elected far-right government in the Netherlands has expressed its desire to opt-out of EU migration policies, further complicating collective efforts. In a stark display of opposition, Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has consistently criticized the EU framework, even threatening to send migrants to Brussels’ Grand Place in a provocative act of defiance. Kristersson condemned Hungary’s recent actions as "playing a very destructive role" and emphasized that Sweden, along with other EU states, has chosen to withdraw from informal political discussions held in Hungary as a punishment for its divisive stance.
As Poland prepares to assume the EU presidency at the turn of the new year, attention turns to how these discussions will evolve amid escalating hostility from Russia and Belarus, as well as internal fractures within the EU.
Data on migration trends reveals a more nuanced picture. The EU Commission reports a two-thirds decrease in irregular migrants crossing the central Mediterranean this year, mostly due to improved capabilities of Libya and Tunisia following agreements with the EU aimed at suppressing human trafficking. Conversely, migration via the Western Balkans has seen a drastic drop of 79% compared to the same period in the previous year. However, the number of migrants attempting to reach the Canary Islands via the Western Mediterranean has surged by 56%.
This evolving migration narrative encapsulates the urgent need for a more responsive and adaptable asylum framework that can withstand the pressures of international politics and ensure the protection of vulnerable populations while maintaining national security within EU borders. As leaders deliberate on these pressing issues, the focus remains on fostering a united and strategic approach to the ongoing migration challenges.
Related Sources: