Navigating a New World Disorder: The Rise of Trumpism and Global Power Dynamics
As Donald Trump potentially prepares for another term as US president, the international landscape is being reshaped in ways reminiscent of historical power struggles. His interest in territories like Greenland, Panama, and Canada echoes the ambitions of past leaders such as Vladimir Putin regarding Crimea and Xi Jinping concerning Taiwan. This emerging world disorder, marked by transactionalism, is redefining relationships and alliances that were considered stable in the late 20th century.
Liberal democracies, particularly in Europe, must confront the realities of a world increasingly influenced by revisionist powers like Russia and China. These nations seek to alter or undermine the existing global order, while middle powers such as Turkey, Brazil, and South Africa navigate this tumultuous landscape, often playing both sides to their advantage.
The stark geopolitical climate is reflected in recent conflict zones, from Ukraine to the Middle East, and existing tensions highlight a departure from the relative peace that characterized late 20th-century Europe. As new power dynamics unfold globally, the United States under Trump is showing signs of aligning more with these transactional approaches rather than adhering to traditional alliances.
Insight into global sentiment has been provided through a comprehensive 24-country opinion poll conducted by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) in conjunction with Oxford University. The findings reveal a significant shift in perceptions surrounding Trump's potential presidency. Notably, many non-European nations express optimism regarding his return, believing it could foster peace in Ukraine and the Middle East. Countries such as India and Saudi Arabia, alongside others like Brazil and South Africa, show a more favorable view towards Trump than European nations, which often express concerns about his leadership.
The poll reveals a stark contrast between European views and those of the global south regarding Russian influence. While many observers in Europe anticipate Russia's strategic decline following the invasion of Ukraine, countries such as China and India still see Russia as a viable partner, anticipating an increase in its global influence over the next decade.
Despite the expectation of heightened US power in the future, global sentiments are emerging that suggest a growing strength for China, with majorities in numerous surveyed nations projecting that China will surpass the US in global dominance within the next 20 years. Interestingly, even among Americans surveyed, opinions are split equally on this matter, highlighting a shift in national confidence towards the US's global standing.
Europe finds itself in a precarious position, revealing a lack of unity in perceptions about its relationship with the US. A survey conducted across several EU member states indicates that only 22% consider the US an ally, while 51% view it as a necessary partner. This skepticism is contrasted with the perception of stronger allyship between Russia and China, as seen in significant portions of public opinion in both nations.
In response to Trump’s possible return, varying sentiments among European countries suggest that while some nations are warming to his policies, as demonstrated by leaders like Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Hungary's Viktor Orbán, a united front against Trumpism appears unlikely. Instead, individual countries within Europe may seek to negotiate their own terms with the US, leading to an even more transactional approach in their international relations.
To navigate this new world disorder, Timothy Garton Ash identifies four key lessons for liberal democracies, especially in Europe: 1. Recognize the world as it is, rather than how one wishes it to be. 2. Move beyond simplistic categorization of global powers; view them as they see themselves, understanding their unique histories and interests. 3. Embrace a nuanced approach to international relations, acknowledging the complex interdependence of countries rather than adhering to binary stances. 4. Foster coordinated collective action among smaller European nations to strengthen their position in a world that favors assertive powers.
The rise of Trumpism and the shifting global power landscape emphasizes the need for unity among European democracies while balancing their transactional relations with global powers. Only through concerted efforts can Europe's smaller nations wield adequate influence in a rapidly evolving international arena.
Related Sources: