New Rules for Journalists in Congress Spark Controversy

On Tuesday, the Congress Table approved a new instruction that explicitly outlines the behaviors of journalists subject to sanction, and details which media outlets will be denied accreditation. This development comes in the wake of a reform of the Congress Regulations, which was already met with opposition from the Popular Party (PP) and Vox. The new regulations stipulate that media outlets with fewer than ten employees or those in debt to Social Security will not receive accreditation. The ruling party, the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE), argues that the rule aims not to restrict journalistic activity, but rather to address issues caused by what they term 'pseudojournalists' who disrupt parliamentary and press functions. This perspective has drawn criticism from opposition parties, particularly those who view it as an encroachment on press freedom. One significant aspect of the approved resolution is the delineation of areas within the Congress where journalists can operate freely and others that require authorization. Furthermore, it states that only graphic reporters are permitted to capture images and videos within the Chamber, thus restricting literary journalists from doing so. The new rules also formalize the process by which accreditations will be granted. The Congress Communication Directorate will oversee this process, with a list detailing which outlets are eligible for authorization based on specific criteria, including the prerequisite of having a minimum staff of ten registered employees and being current with Social Security payments. Several types of media outlets are explicitly banned from accreditation, including websites, blogs, YouTube channels, and digital broadcasting stations lacking administrative concessions. Additionally, journalists who are affiliated with communication teams of political parties or foundations will be prohibited from receiving accreditations. If a journalist commits an act that may incur sanctions, the incident can be reported to the Communication department. The newly established Advisory Council of Parliamentary Communication (CCCP) will then evaluate the case. This council will comprise members from various parties, with decisions on whether to recommend penalties based on weighted majority votes according to each party's representation in Congress. Despite claims that the measures are aimed at organizing and regulating media access, critics of the resolution argue that it could suppress legitimate journalistic work and further limit the transparency of parliamentary proceedings. As discussions around this topic continue, the implications for the press and its role within governmental institutions remain a key concern for many observers. Related Sources: • Source 1 • Source 2