Romania's Constitutional Court Orders Vote Recount Amid Electoral Fraud Allegations
Romania’s constitutional court has mandated a comprehensive recount of all first-round votes from the recent presidential election, as the legitimacy of the results has come under scrutiny due to allegations of electoral fraud. The court's decision comes after a significant upset in the election, where the little-known far-right candidate, Călin Georgescu, emerged victorious.
On Thursday, the court ruled unanimously that Romania’s central electoral bureau must recheck and recount all valid and invalid ballots cast during the election held on Sunday. Reports from Digi24.ro indicate that this action was prompted by complaints regarding suspected irregularities related to the center-right candidate, Elena Lasconi, who finished in second place and is set to face Georgescu in a runoff set for December 8.
The court will also be deliberating on whether to annul the results of the first round, a decision that is anticipated to be addressed in a meeting set for Friday. Meanwhile, a separate complaint alleging electoral fraud against Georgescu himself was dismissed, as it was claimed to have been submitted beyond the allowable timeline.
In light of the court’s ruling, the central election bureau is convening to review the mandate, but its president Toni Greblă warned that the recount process could take days to complete, given that approximately 9.5 million votes need to be re-evaluated.
This recent development raises concerns among observers, who suggest that such actions could undermine the credibility of Romania's state institutions, especially as the country approaches critical parliamentary elections and a presidential runoff that could shape its future as a reliable ally within the EU and NATO.
Adding to the turbulence surrounding the electoral process, Georgescu’s campaign, which gained momentum largely from viral content on the social media platform TikTok, has faced accusations of manipulation. Reports indicate that the Romanian telecoms regulatory authority, Ancom, has called for a temporary suspension of TikTok, citing evidence of electoral process manipulation as a basis for this investigation.
Pavel Popescu, deputy head of Ancom, announced that the regulator’s intervention stemmed from findings suggesting potential interference from state and non-state actors in the electoral system. The national audiovisual council (CNA) has also urged the European Commission to investigate TikTok, suspecting that the platform played a role in manipulating public opinion, notably through the algorithmic amplification of content that favored particular candidates.
In defense of its actions, TikTok has dismissed the allegations, with a spokesperson labeling them as inaccurate and misleading. They emphasized that many candidates utilized TikTok for their campaigns and pointed out that the candidates who ultimately won also leveraged other digital platforms.
Furthermore, the political atmosphere in Romania is further complicated as, in October, the constitutional court had previously barred another far-right politician from ascending to the presidency, a move that drew criticism from analysts, civil rights groups, and some political factions for allegedly overreaching its legal authority.
Georgescu’s political stance includes controversial positions, such as calling for an end to the war in Ukraine and denying the existence of Covid-19. He has also referred to certain Romanian fascists from the World War II era as 'national heroes.' His foreign policy viewpoints suggest a pro-Russia sentiment, which analysts fear could impact Romania’s alignment within the EU and NATO moving forward.
As Romania progresses toward the congressional elections and the presidential runoff, the looming recount and the investigations into the integrity of the electoral process raise significant questions about the democratic integrity and future political landscape of the country.
Related Sources: