Rome Court Challenges Italy's Migrant Detention Policy Amid European Rulings
On Monday, a Rome court suspended the confirmation of detention orders for seven migrants who were recently transferred to asylum seeker centers established by the Italian government in Albania. This ruling mandates their release and marks a significant legal challenge as the judges have also referred the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
Initially, eight migrants from Egypt and Bangladesh were selected for this transfer; however, one was deemed vulnerable due to health issues and had to return to Italy. This court decision represents the second instance where judges have refused to validate detention orders, which are critically required to hold migrants in repatriation centers in Albania.
The seven individuals now in Albania were among the few selected from hundreds who had arrived in Lampedusa, fulfilling specific criteria for the transfer. They are adult men traveling without family, hailing from nations classified as safe by the Italian government. Italy's classification refers to countries that uphold freedoms, civil rights, and maintain a democratic system. For those who qualify, there exists an expedited procedure for examining asylum requests while they are in detention.
In a parallel case in October, judges did not validate the detention orders for 12 migrants, influenced by a recent ruling from the CJEU which constrains the ability of countries to declare others as 'safe.' Although not directly related to Italy, the ruling—stemming from the case of a Moldovan citizen—clarifies the assessment of asylum seekers' safety based on comprehensive conditions across the country in question. The CJEU indicated that a designated safe country must indeed be secure in its entirety and for every individual residing there. Additionally, judges must verify and reevaluate a country’s status during the decision-making process for each asylum claimant.
Shortly after the initial ruling, the Italian Council of Ministers signed off on a legal decree that laid out an updated list of so-called safe origin countries. This new list closely mirrors one approved in the spring, raising questions about its effectiveness. Already in October, the Rome court had affirmed that the CJEU's rulings supersede Italian law, as enshrined in the Italian Constitution.
Asylum policy in Italy is becoming increasingly contentious, as judicial rulings grapple with evolving European standards and national legislative measures. The court's latest decision to question the legality of detention orders reflects a growing emphasis on human rights amidst the stringent migratory controls imposed by the Italian government. The developments highlight not only the complexities surrounding asylum but also the balancing act between national legislation and European judicial oversight.
Related Sources: