Russia's Calculated Stance as U.S. Elections Loom: Implications for Ukraine
In the midst of ongoing tensions, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky recently highlighted the significant role the upcoming U.S. elections play in Russia's approach to negotiating peace in Ukraine. "It depends on the elections in the United States," he stated, conveying the precarious balance of power influenced by American policy shifts.
The contrasting positions of the leading candidates compound the uncertainty surrounding future support for Ukraine. If elected, Kamala Harris is anticipated to align closely with President Biden's policies, which have largely favored Ukraine despite occasional disputes over the use of Western weaponry against Russia. Conversely, Donald Trump has publicly suggested a stark pivot, proposing to withdraw U.S. support for Ukraine’s military efforts and hinting at a potential quick resolution to the conflict—a proposal reminiscent of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s demands.
Political analysts imply that regardless of who occupies the White House, the likelihood of Russia engaging meaningfully in negotiations remains low. Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted, "What Trump thinks he can do and what leverage he has is unclear at this point. I don't think it's a quick process."
The implications of a reduced U.S. aid budget could be severe for Ukraine. Analysts warn that such a shift could change the dynamics on the battlefield, potentially benefiting Russia. With either candidate, Putin aims to exploit perceived political instability in the United States as well as fractures within Western alliances. These fractures appear increasingly plausible in a divided U.S. Congress or a Trump administration that pulls back on NATO obligations, coupled with economic challenges facing European allies.
Experts agree that Russia's strategic calculus extends beyond a simple negotiation with Ukraine; it is emblematic of a wider geopolitical struggle. For Putin, using Ukraine as a tool to diminish U.S. influence on the global stage is central to his strategy. John Lough, an associate fellow at Chatham House, remarked, “When Trump's advisers explain to him what's really going on here... he may feel suddenly very strongly that he's not so well disposed to Putin.”
The war in Ukraine continues to wage despite staggering casualty figures, with NATO estimating over 600,000 Russian troops killed or injured. Ukrainian commanders on the ground report a relentless Russian strategy that relies heavily on manpower and attritional warfare, with reports of aggressive troop movements in contested territories like the Kursk region and Zaporizhzhia.
Despite commendable fortifications and a resilient defense by Ukraine, the nation faces a daunting battle against Russia’s overwhelming troop numbers, sophisticated drone technology, and heavy artillery. In response to the prolonged threat, Ukraine is extending its martial law and potential military draft, revealing the urgency of bolstering its ranks amid fears that U.S. support might falter.
As resources dwindle and strategic challenges mount, calls for increased ammunition and military aid from Western allies intensify. Still, the response from these allies appears insufficient to make substantive battlefield gains. Chatham House’s Lough predicts a prolonged conflict, suggesting that while a potential Harris administration would not abandon Ukraine, continued attritional warfare would test the resolve of the Ukrainian people.
Zelensky has persistently appealed for bipartisan support in the U.S. Acknowledging the severe human costs and atrocities, including the mass killings and forced deportations, he remains adamant that a settlement requiring Ukraine to concede to Russian demands is insupportable. The outlook remains precarious, with ongoing discussions and strategic decisions in American politics set to influence the future of not just Ukraine, but the broader international landscape as well.
Related Sources: