Spain's Controversial Deportation of Sahrawi Asylum Seekers Raises International Concerns
In a significant and contentious move, the Spanish Ministry of the Interior has deported sixteen Sahrawi asylum seekers who had been stranded at Madrid airport after their requests for international protection were denied. The deportations have sparked outrage and raised urgent questions about Spain's immigration policies and its treatment of vulnerable populations seeking refuge.
The deported individuals were flown back to Marrakech on a late-night flight after spending nearly a month at the airport, according to legal sources who spoke to EFE. This decision has left fifteen others still in the asylum rooms, with some already scheduled for deportation on an upcoming flight. The situation has compounded fears for the safety of these individuals, as family members reported that two of the deported were detained by Moroccan authorities upon their return and are now being interrogated.
Each of the deportees carried documentation confirming their Sahrawi origin, issued by the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) or by Spain itself, recognizing the 1974 census. Additionally, they had received a favorable recommendation from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to allow their entry into Spain to process their applications for statelessness, alongside their international protection requests.
UNHCR's reports suggested that Spain authorize the entry of these Sahrawis, citing the impracticality of handling their asylum process while they remained at the airport. A recent ruling from the Spanish Supreme Court supported this, allowing a statelessness procedure to commence even for applicants at border posts, indicating judicial recognition of the asylum seekers' plight.
In response to these developments, the Ministry of the Interior has refrained from providing specific information, yet emphasized its commitment to evaluating each case based on both national and international legal requirements. The handling of these cases has been met with skepticism from various political factions; Podemos, a leftist party, has condemned the government for allegedly orchestrating deportations without adequate oversight. They allege that certain officials from the Socialist party (PSOE) have taken steps to ensure that these deportations proceed without legislative scrutiny, raising alarms about the treatment of asylum seekers.
Notably, members of Podemos, including leaders such as Belarra, Montero, and Serra, were reportedly denied access to speak with the asylum seekers at the airport, prompting further outcry about the sanitary conditions and the lack of adequate oversight in these facilities. The situation has escalated to a political stalemate, with Podemos demanding an immediate halt to ongoing deportations and accusing the government of complicity with the Moroccan regime.
The commotion surrounding the deportations highlights a broader issue concerning the treatment of Sahrawi individuals who have long faced persecution. Western Sahara remains a territory under dispute, with Morocco controlling a large portion while the Polisario Front seeks independence.
Critics of the current administration, including Podemos, argue that the migration policies under Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez do not differ significantly from those of the previous conservative government led by the People's Party (PP). Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska has backed the deportations, affirming that asylum seekers lacking legal protection would face removal, a stance that has been judicially validated.
The deportation of these Sahrawis raises significant ethical and humanitarian questions. The actions taken by Spain not only reflect on its domestic policy but also resonate within the international community, prompting scrutiny and accountability regarding the treatment of refugees and asylum seekers. As the situation evolves, the eyes of civil society organizations and international human rights bodies remain focused on Spain's adherence to its obligations and principles in handling vulnerable populations seeking refuge.
Related Sources: