Supreme Court To Investigate MEP Luis Alvise Pérez for Alleged Illegal Political Funding
In a significant development in the realm of political finance, National Court judge José Luis Calama has referred a case to the Supreme Court involving MEP Luis Alvise Pérez, stemming from allegations raised by businessman Álvaro Romillo, also known as Cryptospain. Romillo has accused Pérez of engaging in illegal financing practices for his political party, Se acabó la Fiesta, reportedly receiving a sum of 100,000 euros intended for the party.
The judicial inquiry includes substantial evidence suggesting potential criminal activity associated with Pérez, whose status as a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) gives him a unique position that necessitates examination by the Supreme Court. Judge Calama's reasoned statement, as relayed by Europa Press, asserts that given Pérez's privileged position, only the Supreme Court possesses the jurisdiction to investigate the allegations against him.
The judge’s ruling highlights not only the concerns regarding Pérez’s actions but also implicates Romillo, the businessman who allegedly funded this questionable transaction. Calama believes there exists a direct link between both parties: the alleged payment signifies a collaborative effort in circumventing legal restrictions surrounding the financing of political entities.
In the judge's view, Romillo's actions could be categorized as either active donations or illegal contributions. The law prescribes penalties for individuals who make donations intended for political parties or similar entities, whether directly or through intermediaries.
This investigation gained traction after the initial complaint was filed last October, prompting the establishment of a separate inquiry by the Central Investigation Court Number 4. During the investigation, it was identified that the events described might indicate a breach of laws governing political party financing. Subsequently, Pérez was offered the opportunity to testify voluntarily before the court last November, yet he failed to appear for the session.
The implications of this case could resonate through both the political landscape and the financial structures that support political activities in Spain. As the Supreme Court takes on this inquiry, it marks a critical moment in addressing transparency in political funding and accountability for public officials.
Related Sources: