Syria's Uncertain Future: A Battleground for Regional Powers
Just over three months have passed since the regime of Bashar al-Assad fell in Syria, igniting hope among millions of Syrians for a better future. Yet, that light remains dim as security and economic challenges loom large. Massacres, mainly against Alawites along the Mediterranean coast, have resulted in approximately 1,000 deaths, leaving other minorities such as Druze, Christians, and Kurds in fear for their safety. The interim government, led by President Ahmed al-Scharaa, has failed to fulfill promises like raising state employee wages, which remain under 100 euros a month. The lack of a coherent reconstruction plan has left Syria struggling to regain stability, exacerbated by diverging interests of major powers both regionally and internationally.
Turkey has emerged as a primary player in the aftermath of Assad's fall. Initially, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's government benefited from the weakened regime as they had supported the victorious rebel group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). Erdoğan’s vision is for a stable Syria led by a Sunni-Islamist HTS government, marking a significant step toward bolstering Turkey's influence in the region. However, tensions have surfaced, particularly regarding the Kurdish population; the HTS coalition, in an agreement with local forces, aims to integrate Kurdish fighters into the Syrian military, a move that Turkey vehemently opposes as it associates Kurdish groups with terrorism.
From Israel's perspective, the fall of Assad opened new avenues, albeit fraught with danger. Historically, Syria has been perceived as a threat, and with the severed ties with Iran's military support, Israel is keen to maintain a limited Syrian presence that poses no threats to its security. Netanyahu's government hopes to see a weak Syria unable to challenge Israel, which is why they've undertaken preemptive military actions to diminish Syria's air capabilities and provide support to the Kurdish forces, who antagonize the Erdoğan regime.
The U.S. position remains pivotal in determining Syria's trajectory. President Donald Trump has expressed skepticism about Syria’s potential for improvement, labeling it a 'mess.' He has retained U.S. troops in the region to protect oil resources and Kurdish allies from Turkish aggression, indicating mixed signals about American involvement in the country’s evolving landscape.
Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, once staunch supporters of the opposition, appear to have shifted their focus. Their recent readmission of Assad into the Arab League reflects a loss of faith in an opposition victory. Meanwhile, Iran, despite suffering a setback with Assad's departure, still seeks to regain influence over Syria, viewing a turbulent political environment as advantageous to its objectives in the region.
Russia, the ally who backed Assad for years, now finds itself reassessing its position in a radically altered landscape. President Putin, having invested significant military resources into supporting Assad, is now left contemplating loss of influence, though he aims to retain military bases in the country for strategic advantage.
The complex interplay between these regional and global powers leaves Syria teetering on the brink of chaos, with its future dependent on external influences that may or may not prioritize the Syrian people’s well-being. As the dust settles, the challenges ahead remain as profound and intricate as they were during the bloody years of war.
Related Sources: