Tension over Greenland: Russia, US, and the Arctic's Strategic Interests

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has stated that Russia is actively monitoring the escalating tensions regarding Greenland, particularly following US President-elect Donald Trump's controversial remarks about potential military action to acquire the territory from Denmark. Peskov emphasized the Arctic's significance within Russia's national interests, asserting the nation's commitment to preserving peace and stability in the region.

Trump's suggestions about Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark, have garnered stern warnings from European leaders. Kaja Kallas, the EU's foreign affairs chief, stressed the need to respect Greenland's territorial integrity and sovereignty, while German Chancellor Olaf Scholz reinforced the principle that borders should not be changed by force.

In comments made earlier this week, Trump indicated that the United States needs Denmark as well as the Panama Canal for economic security, and he did not dismiss the possibility of using military force to secure these interests. He controversially referred to the border with Canada as an 'artificially drawn line'. Both Denmark and Canada are close NATO allies of the United States.

Responding to Trump's statements, Peskov remarked that the matter was primarily for the US, Denmark, and other relevant nations, but highlighted that Russia is closely observing the situation, which he described as 'dramatic'. He assured that Russia is committed to maintaining its presence in the Arctic.

Outgoing US Secretary of State Antony Blinken attempted to mitigate concerns surrounding Trump's statements during a recent visit to Paris, stating that such ideas were not only impractical but also unlikely to come to fruition.

Greenland, home to approximately 56,000 residents, is strategically significant due to its military bases for both the US and Denmark, and its wealth of untapped minerals and oil resources. Greenland's Prime Minister Mute Egede has been an advocate for independence, although the territory remains heavily reliant on Danish subsidies. Both Egede and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen have reaffirmed that Greenland is not for sale and that its future should be decided by its own people.

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy downplayed Trump's rhetoric, acknowledging its intensity while highlighting the unpredictability inherent in what Trump sometimes says can be destabilizing.

Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen has asserted Copenhagen's strong interest in ensuring that the US, its closest ally, maintains a crucial role amid rising tensions in the North Atlantic, especially related to Russian actions.

The European Commission described Trump's threat toward Greenland as 'extremely theoretical and wildly hypothetical,' given that he had not yet assumed office; however, it confirmed that Greenland, as an overseas territory, falls under a mutual assistance clause requiring all EU states to defend it in the event of an attack.

In contrast, the Kremlin ridiculed the European response, suggesting that it seemed timid and almost whisper-like. Last week, Greenland's leadership echoed calls for a separation from colonialism, with no explicit mention of the USA. Pele Broberg, former Greenland foreign minister and current leader of the largest opposition party, conveyed that many Greenlanders view the United States as critical for their defense and safety. He advocated for a free association agreement with the US that would confer independence to Greenland while transferring security responsibilities to the US.

Support for Trump’s views on Greenland was echoed by his allies. Keith Kellogg, who was chosen by Trump to resolve the conflict in Ukraine, stated that much of Trump's rhetoric regarding Greenland made sense in terms of positioning the United States as a global leader. Republican Congressman Mike Walz remarked that the discussion extends beyond Greenland itself; it encompasses the Arctic, where Russia is perceived to be asserting control over valuable mineral and natural resources. He emphasized that while Denmark is an important ally, Greenland should not be treated as a secluded area as it is located in the Western hemisphere and has strategic significance.

Related Sources:

• Source 1 • Source 2