The Fragile Foundations of Transatlantic Relations: Trump, Europe, and the New Geopolitical Landscape

When Donald Trump, with his usual serious expression as president-elect, attended the reopening of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, the European leaders present, including Volodymyr Zelensky, were unaware that the event was almost an allegory of the evolving relations between Europe and the United States. These ties were constructed like the historic cathedral itself, supported by wooden beams. It only took a spark to burn everything to the ground. That spark, which had long been anticipated and was confirmed, was Donald Trump.

In that moment, European leaders might have still harbored certain hopes regarding Trump and his administration, viewing the U.S. as their main ally. However, the sentiments in the ranks of European citizens were already shifting. Shortly after Trump's election, the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) conducted a survey across eleven EU member states, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine. The findings were startling: the populations across these regions no longer perceived the United States as a steadfast ally but merely as a necessary partner.

Now, with Trump dramatically questioning even the efficacy of that necessity, the divide has only grown. Recently, he made a provocative statement on his social media platform, Truth Social, dismissing any lingering concerns over Europe's significance. With a statement emphasizing the oceans separating the U.S. from Europe, the disregard was palpable. As Jeremy Shapiro, research director of the ECFR, contemplates Trump's perspective, he posits that perhaps the U.S. overestimates its world significance, noting that Trump seemed indifferent to Europe's affairs just as he would be toward regions like Guatemala.

But it isn't just Trump's dismissal of Europe that worries leaders; the alliance with Russia is now troubling as well. Recent headlines in publications such as Politico reflect this sentiment. European leaders find themselves in a state of shock, scrambling to salvage their position while they grapple with how to navigate a global landscape that increasingly favors an alliance between the U.S. and Russia under Trump, with notable unease towards China and India, who appear optimistic about this geopolitical rearrangement.

The ECFR survey also revealed stark divisions within Europe regarding the war in Ukraine, showcasing a divide in public opinion. While there was consensus that Ukraine and Russia should seek a resolution, the approach varied widely. Contrasting stances emerged: many Northern European nations, such as Denmark, Estonia, Poland, and the UK, preferred a Ukrainian victory and expressed a desire for European support to maintain the fight rather than negotiate, perceiving diplomacy as defeat. Conversely, countries like Spain favored negotiations, though differences persisted even within these nations around NATO membership for Ukraine.

This discord is compounded by perceptions of the war's ownership. In specific countries like Bulgaria, Hungary, and Switzerland, there is a prevalent belief that both Zelensky and Russia have roles to play in mediating peace. On the flip side, nations such as Denmark and Poland regard Russia as a formidable adversary that cannot simply be negotiated with.

Further complicating this scenario are various attitudes toward Ukraine's membership in the European Union. In Italy and France, for example, half the population does not recognize Ukraine as a part of Europe. Current dynamics have led Christopher Chivvis, a former U.S. intelligence officer, to articulate a reevaluation of U.S.-European relations, suggesting that while divorce has not occurred, a significant renegotiation process is underway. He warns that the foundational relationship nurtured for decades since the U.S. rose to superpower status may soon transform in ways that fundamentally reshape the future of modern democracy, a fabric historically woven from European ideals and transatlantic ties.

A European diplomat succinctly articulated the rising tensions, claiming that the transatlantic alliance has effectively ended. In their view, the new alliance is between a Russian president intent on destabilizing Europe and a U.S. president who appears indifferent to European stability. Chivvis is not optimistic about French President Emmanuel Macron's attempts to forge consensus amidst this crisis, describing the path ahead as exceptionally arduous.

Despite these challenges, leaders like Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer are seeking to identify shared ground with Trump during their anticipated meeting in Washington next week, akin to firefighters attempting to salvage Notre Dame amid chaos. The precariousness of transatlantic relations has never been more evident, and the path forward remains shrouded in uncertainty.

Related Sources:

• Source 1 • Source 2