The Implications of Trump's Election on Climate Policy at COP29

The recent election of Donald Trump as President of the United States is poised to have significant ramifications for international climate negotiations, particularly at the 29th United Nations Conference on Climate Change (COP29) underway in Baku, Azerbaijan. While the Biden administration represents the U.S. at this summit, Trump’s stance on climate change, marked by a denial of its severity and a commitment to withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, raises concerns about the future of global climate cooperation.

During his first presidency, Trump famously labeled climate change a ‘Chinese hoax’ and dismantled over a hundred environmental regulations to bolster oil and gas production in the U.S., showcasing a determined shift towards fossil fuel exploitation. His campaign slogans embraced a return to aggressive drilling initiatives, underscoring a stark contrast to the previous administration's commitment to renewable energy and emissions reductions.

Trump's electoral victory likely heralds a renewed push to exit the Paris Agreement, which binds nations to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. If he proceeds with this withdrawal, it will take a year for the U.S. to officially leave, thereby allowing Trump to sidestep the commitments and emissions reduction targets that the Biden administration might establish in the meantime.

Should the United States withdraw from the Paris Agreement, it will also absolve itself of financial obligations to support developing countries in their climate adaptation and mitigation efforts—a critical discussion point at COP29. The influence of U.S. policy decisions on global climate dynamics cannot be understated, with the nation being the second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases. Experts warn that Trump's approach could erode faith in international climate commitments, complicating efforts to keep global warming below 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, a key target of the Paris Agreement.

Some observers express cautious optimism; the global landscape for renewable energy and climate initiatives has evolved since Trump’s first term. The burgeoning transition to cleaner energy sources has evidenced economic viability and a consolidated push towards sustainability that holds considerable promise. Furthermore, no other major country has followed suit after the U.S. exited the Paris Agreement in 2019, suggesting a resilience in international climate resolve.

However, the implications of Trump’s anticipated policy shifts extend beyond international dynamics. His intention to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, which injects $740 billion into renewable energy and climate response measures, could critically undermine American efforts at home, stalling advancements in clean energy technologies, such as wind and solar power. Although there may be resistance from within the Republican party regarding the complete dismantling of these initiatives due to their positive reception among constituents and industries, the overarching direction of U.S. economic policy remains uncertain.

While Trump's presidency may usher in challenges to U.S. leadership in climate policy, the structure of domestic initiatives could still channel significant reductions in emissions. A coalition of states and local governments, organized under the banner of the U.S. Climate Alliance and other efforts, continues to commit to reducing emissions. According to studies, independent efforts by these regions could yield a 48% reduction by 2035 compared to 2005 levels, even in the absence of federal leadership.

The upcoming COP29 undoubtedly represents a pivotal moment for the global climate agenda. As the nations of the world convene in Baku, the fragility of the international cooperative framework for climate change mitigation will be tested against the backdrop of changing U.S. leadership values—a true litmus test for the resilience of global climate action.

Related Sources:

• Source 1 • Source 2