The Stark Shift in Venezuelan Politics: María Corina Machado's Fall from Grace
For several years, María Corina Machado emerged as a prominent leader in the Venezuelan opposition, earning recognition for her steadfast resolve in confronting the regime. In recent months, high-profile endorsements from figures like U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio positioned her as a key player for Venezuela's potential democratic transition. However, the political landscape took a dramatic turn following the U.S. attack on January 3 that captured President Nicolás Maduro. Contrary to expectations, Machado's role rapidly diminished, as Donald Trump publicly suggested that she lacked sufficient support to lead the country, opting instead to endorse Maduro's vice president, Delcy Rodríguez.
Currently, Machado remains distant from her home country, with attempts to return viewed as perilous. This follows her recent Nobel Peace Prize recognition, which previously signaled her status as a leading democratic counterweight to the Venezuelan regime. Yet, a few days later, she has found herself sidelined in an evolving political scenario where clarity on the U.S. strategy for post-Maduro governance remains elusive. The priority seems less focused on re-establishing democratic norms and more aligned with securing economic agreements on oil exploitation and tackling drug trafficking, elevating immediate economic incentives over political stability.
CIA sources suggest that Machado's anticipated lack of military backing was a crucial factor in the U.S. decision-making process. Positioning her as the new leader could have catalyzed civil unrest, complicating the effort to restore order. In contrast, Rodríguez, a regime loyalist, is perceived as offering a more manageable transition path in the short run.
Further complicating Machado's situation is the controversy surrounding her acceptance of the Nobel Prize. Reports indicate that Trump's decision to back Rodríguez may have been influenced by Machado's acceptance. Despite her public support for Trump's policies, this was overshadowed by a perceived inadequacy in her response regarding the Nobel Prize, which Trump argued she should have refused.
The history of U.S. support for Venezuelan opposition leaders weighed heavily on the Trump administration's considerations, particularly the unsuccessful backing of Juan Guaidó, who was initially recognized as the legitimate president by the U.S. and its allies but ultimately failed to displace Maduro. Guaidó's fall from grace culminated in his exile, leaving a lingering wariness about similar missteps with Machado.
Amidst this turmoil, Machado made her first appearance in nearly a year during the Nobel award ceremony in Oslo on December 10. Despite her public proclamations calling Maduro’s capture a historic moment and praising Trump, she condemned Rodríguez as a primary perpetrator of the regime's corruption and human rights violations. Machado's eagerness to return to Venezuela stands in stark contrast to the daunting conditions enforced by Maduro's regime, which continues to suppress political dissent.
Ironically, her alignment with U.S. support may have eroded some of her former popularity among Venezuelans, who view her actions as excessively leaning towards foreign influence. In recent months, Machado has attempted to regain footing by backing U.S. military actions and controversially endorsing bombings targeting alleged drug traffickers, moves that drew significant criticism from various quarters, including legal experts.
With Trump reaffirming that no elections will occur in Venezuela imminently, asserting a need for stabilization first, the opportunity to gauge Machado's popularity remains murky. The Venezuelan Constitution allows the Supreme Court and parliament to appoint an interim president temporarily, yet no timelines have been established for Rodríguez’s tenure. As the political scenario unfolds, questions about the legitimacy of support for either Machado or Rodríguez continue to shape Venezuela's complex and fraught political landscape.
Related Sources:
• Source 1 • Source 2