Trump's Executive Order Sparks Controversy Over Seabed Mining
On Thursday, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that initiates a large-scale program for the extraction of minerals from the seabed. This controversial practice is hailed by some as essential for securing critical minerals needed for the energy transition, such as lithium, scandium, and cobalt. However, it has faced significant backlash due to concerns over its environmental impact. Critics argue that seabed mining could lead to the destruction of valuable marine ecosystems where these activities take place.
Trump's executive order extends to extraction activities in international waters, raising legal and ethical questions about sovereignty and oversight. This move is seen as a violation of the jurisdiction of the International Seabed Authority (ISA), an independent body affiliated with the United Nations. The ISA is responsible for coordinating and overseeing mining activities beyond the exclusive economic zones of individual countries.
Established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which came into force in 1994, the ISA represents a global effort to manage the seabed's resources sustainably. Although the United States signed this agreement, it has never ratified it, placing it in a complicated position in global maritime law.
In a related development, Norway recently became the first country to authorize seabed mining for commercial purposes, setting a precedent that some fear could lead to a global rush for mineral extraction from our oceans. The implications of such extraction practices not only threaten marine biodiversity but also challenge international norms and cooperation on ocean governance.
As the debate surrounding seabed mining intensifies, it remains to be seen whether the perceived benefits of acquiring these essential minerals will outweigh the potential environmental costs and legal ramifications of unilateral actions taken by individual nations.
Related Sources: