Tunisia's 2023 Presidential Elections: A Polarized Dilemma Amid Authoritarianism
As Tunisia approaches its presidential elections on October 6, the political landscape is starkly different from five years ago. In 2019, a plethora of candidates vied for the presidency, with the walls of polling stations adorned by the faces of twenty-six contenders. Today, however, the display is limited to three official candidates, a dramatic reflection of President Kais Saied's consolidation of power following his controversial coup in July 2021.
The remaining candidates include Saied himself, Zouhair Maghzaoui, a supporter of the president, and Ayachi Zammel, a former liberal deputy who has ironically become the only voice of opposition despite facing significant restrictions. Zammel was sentenced in September to nearly fourteen years in prison on multiple charges, hindering his ability to campaign.
The absence of meaningful competition raises troubling questions about the legitimacy of the upcoming elections. Saied's political maneuvering has effectively dismantled Tunisia's multiparty system, replacing it with a parliament composed solely of independent candidates and instituting a new constitution through a referendum that garnered less than 30% participation.
The Independent Superior Electoral Instance (ISIE), now perceived as an extension of Saied's presidency, has also contributed to the exclusion of potential candidates, rejecting numerous applications from those who could challenge the current regime. Zammel's continued candidacy highlights the absurdity of the situation: while he remains on the ballot, most of his political colleagues are either imprisoned or barred from running.
Zammel's situation is emblematic of the broader repression faced by those in Tunisia who do not align with Saied’s vision for the country. Following his election as deputy in 2019, Zammel found himself marginalized once the president attempted to block access to parliament. Now, he stands as a reluctant standard-bearer for those opposing Saied's increasingly authoritarian rule.
Moreover, Saied's regime has fostered an atmosphere of fear that stifles dissent. The recent arrest of a young woman for displaying an anti-Saied gesture serves as a testament to the ongoing crackdown on free expression. With Zammel unable to campaign, the pressure mounts on citizens who wish to voice their discontent with Saied’s leadership and the direction in which he has taken the country since the Arab Spring.
Crime, economic challenges, and a deteriorating social climate are key issues at the forefront of voters' minds. Concerns over Saied's handling of nationwide problems, including the plight of sub-Saharan migrants, have been generating tension. Misplaced blame by Saied has led to growing hostility against these migrants, with many leaving Tunisia in search of better prospects in Europe.
The election not only represents a pivotal moment for Tunisia but reflects a broader regional struggle between authoritarianism and democracy. The international community watches closely, perhaps hoping that the electoral process, however flawed, will ignite a spark for change in a country that once promised a path forward after the Arab Spring.
In this context, Ayachi Zammel's unexpected emergence as the lone opposition candidate serves not just as a political comment but echoes the larger narrative of resistance against oppression. Whether or not the people of Tunisia are willing to rally behind him remains to be seen as they head into what could be a historic moment marred by a lack of genuine democratic choice.
Related Sources: