UNIFIL Under Fire: A Closer Look at the UN Peacekeeping Mission in Lebanon
Since yesterday, the UNIFIL mission of the United Nations stationed in southern Lebanon has become a focal point of discussion both in Italy and internationally, following an Israeli military attack on some of its bases located in a hotbed of conflict between the Israeli army and the Lebanese political and military group Hezbollah. This incident, which occurred on Thursday, resulted in injuries to two individuals and prompted severe criticism of Israel from various nations, including Italy. The overarching sentiment expressed is that UN personnel should never be targeted, regardless of their location.
Established by the UN Security Council in 1978 and renewed in 2006, the UNIFIL mission—an acronym for the United Nations Interim Force In Lebanon—was initially crafted to delineate and uphold respect for the border between Israel and Lebanon. Its primary goal is to cultivate a stable and peaceful ceasefire between the two nations.
Currently, over 10,000 soldiers from 50 different countries are stationed in Lebanon under the UNIFIL mandate. Alongside these troops are approximately 750 Lebanese and international civilians who support the mission. Indonesia contributes the largest contingent, comprising around 1,200 soldiers, closely followed by Italy, with roughly a thousand troops. Notably, the current spokesperson for UNIFIL, Andrea Tenenti, is Italian.
The inception of UNIFIL followed Israel's first invasion of Lebanon in 1978, which saw an occupation extending about 20 kilometers deep into Lebanese territory, up to the Litani River. This military action was a response to assaults by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), which had established southern Lebanon as a base for its operations against Israel.
In the immediate aftermath of the invasion, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 425, calling for Israel's withdrawal from Lebanese territory and formally establishing the UNIFIL mission, inclusive of various participating nations, Italy among them. The mission's original mandate was to verify Israel's withdrawal and to reestablish peace and security in the region.
In the years since, Israel has entered Lebanon on multiple occasions, holding parts of it until its withdrawal in 2000. Lacking a formal agreement between Israel and Lebanon, the UN delineated a temporary demarcation line known as the Blue Line, based on Resolution 425, to help regulate the boundary between the two nations.
The UNIFIL mandate was once again revised and broadened in 2006 after yet another conflict erupted between Israel and Hezbollah, further prompted by Israeli incursions into Lebanon. Following this, the UN Security Council approved Resolution 1701, which tasked UNIFIL with monitoring the cessation of hostilities in conjunction with the Lebanese regular army—the only entity authorized to operate and possess weapons in southern Lebanon alongside UNIFIL. However, due to the Lebanese army's perceived limitations and the ambiguity surrounding UNIFIL's mandate, Hezbollah effectively maintains control of much of the region.
The recent attack on UNIFIL bases illustrates the delicate and volatile situation in southern Lebanon. The response from international communities emphasizes the need for protection of UN personnel and underscores the increasingly complex dynamics at play in a region steeped in historical conflict and geopolitical tensions.
As discussions mount regarding the current state of the UNIFIL mission and the broader issues of peacekeeping in conflict zones, the hope remains for a peaceful resolution that ensures the safety of civilians and military personnel alike. In a world where peacekeeping forces are crucial for stability, the international community must remain vigilant and united in its support for UN missions worldwide, particularly in volatile regions like Lebanon.
Related Sources: