US and China Reach Agreement to Reduce Tariffs for 90 Days
On Monday, the governments of the United States and China announced a significant development in their ongoing trade negotiations, agreeing to reduce tariffs imposed on each other for a period of 90 days. This agreement comes in the wake of the Chinese tariffs that were implemented in response to the excessive tariffs announced by President Donald Trump.
The discussions that led to this agreement were held in Switzerland, where negotiators from both countries began their talks over the weekend. Under the terms of the agreement, the United States will lower tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China will reduce tariffs on U.S. goods from 125% to 10%. Both nations have thus reduced their tariffs equally by a substantial 115%.
It is important to note that while the tariffs have been significantly lowered, U.S. tariffs will still remain higher overall, primarily due to the tariffs that were incorrectly classified as reciprocal by Trump. These are set to drop from 90% to 10%, but they will not be eliminated entirely. Furthermore, the 20% tariffs imposed in relation to the fentanyl issue—a highly addictive opioid that has contributed to a severe health crisis in the United States—will remain in place. The Trump administration had previously used the argument surrounding fentanyl to justify similar tariffs on Canada and Mexico, claiming that the respective governments were not doing enough to combat the opioid crisis.
This agreement has been framed as a suspension of tariffs rather than a complete cancellation. In the coming weeks, both countries will continue their negotiations to further address trade issues. The Chinese government has indicated that the implementation of these tariff reductions is set to begin on May 14, Wednesday.
As the negotiations proceed, many are watching closely to see how these changes in tariff rates will affect the global economy and trade relationships between these two countries. The agreement may signal a potential thawing in relations and could pave the way for more substantial discussions on trade in the future.
Related Sources: