Valencia Court Upholds Prosecution of Former Official in Sexual Abuse Cover-up Case
In a significant ruling from the Court of Instruction Number 15 of Valencia, a judge has firmly rejected five appeals put forth by former senior officials, including former deputy president and Minister of Equality, Mónica Oltra. This decision reaffirms their prosecution for allegedly covering up sexual abuses inflicted by Oltra's ex-husband against a minor under state guardianship.
The judge's ruling is underscored by a compelling report from the prosecutor, who argued that accepting any further dismissals would suggest a judicial unwillingness to uphold justice. The prosecutor asserted that there is substantial evidence implicating all defendants, whether directly or indirectly, in actions that warranted continuation of the legal process.
This case, which garnered significant attention and was reexamined following appeals from the victim and political groups—including the far-right Vox party—has revealed troubling allegations of negligence and potential criminal misconduct by those in the Department of Equality. The Audiencia tribunal highlighted that the lack of reporting and protective measures for the minor could amount to a serious breach of duty.
The young woman, who suffered the abuses while living in a shelter, has stepped forward as the private accuser in this case. She has requested a prison sentence of three and a half years for Oltra, coupled with a twelve-year disqualification from public office. Her representation has emphasized that upon becoming aware of the situation, the authorities did not act appropriately and instead sought to conceal the incidents.
The judge has made it clear that the transformation of the preliminary proceedings into an abbreviated procedure aligns with legal requirements and directives issued by the Audiencia. As the case moves toward trial, it is expected that key questions surrounding the facts will be examined in depth, including the actions and possible culpability of those implicated in this distressing matter. As developments unfold, the case continues to draw public scrutiny and raises serious questions about accountability in governmental departments responsible for the protection of vulnerable minors.
Related Sources: